Was It a Mitzvah [Good Deed] Or a Sin Not To Kill King
Sha'ul {Saul}? - Part 2
|
The Bible Testifies That
King Sha'ul Tried To Kill David |
|
B"H
Warning! This
article is appropriate only for those who believe in
Judaism.
|
Is
it Possible To Prove That G-d had ruled that David Erred By Not Killing Sha'ul {Saul}?
An
Examination of the act of Yehu {Jehu}son of Yehoshafat son of Nimshi
II Kings
{parts of} chapters 9 and chapter 10
1] And Elisha the prophet called one of
the prophets' disciples, and said to him: gird up your loins and take this flask
of oil in your hand and go to Ramot-gilad.
2] And when you come there, see
there Yehu the son of Yehoshafat the son of Nimshi, and go in and make him rise
up from among his brothers and carry him in to an inner chamber.
3] Then take
this flask of oil, and pour it on his head, and say, "Thus says G-d, I
have anointed you king over Israel". Then open the door and flee and do not
wait.
4] So the young man, the youthful prophet, went to Ramot-gilad.
5]
And when he came, behold, the commanders of the army were sitting; and he said,
I have an errand regarding you, O commander. Then Yehu said, To which one
from all of us? And he said, to you O commander.
6] Then he rose and went
into the house and he poured the oil on his head and said to him, thus says, G-d
the L-rd of Israel: I have anointed you king over the people of G-d, over
Israel.
7] And you shall strike the house of Ahav {Ahab} your masters;
then that I shall be avenged of the blood of my servants the prophets, and
the blood of all the servants of G-d at the hand of Izevel {Jezebel}.
8] For
the whole house of Ahav will perish: and I will cut off from Ahav all that
urinate upon the wall and him that is shut up and him that is left free in
Israel.
9] Now I will make the house of Ahav like the house of Yarovom
[Jeroboam] son of Nevat and like the house of Basha the son of Ahiyya:
10]
And the dogs shall eat Izevel in the portion of Yizri'el {Jezreel}, and there
shall be no one to bury; then he opened the door and fled.
11] Now Yehu came
out to the servants of his master and one of them said to him, Is all well? Why
did this lunatic come to you: And he said to them, you know this man, and his
way of talking.
12] Then they said, it's a lie; please tell us now. So he
said, thus and thus spoke he to me, saying thus says G-d, I have anointed you
king over Israel.
13] Then they hastened and took every man his garment, and
put it under him on the top of the stairs, and blew with the shofar, saying,
"Yehu has become king".
Yehu carried out the prophetic
command.II Kings chapter 9
21] Now Yehoram said, "Harness!" and he
harnessed his chariot. Then Yehoram the king of Israel and Ahazyahu king of
Judah went out each in his own chariot and they went out against Yehu and met
him in the portion of Navot {Naboth} the Yizri'elite.
22] Then it came to
pass when Yehoram saw Yehu that he said, "Is it peace, Yehu"? Then he answered,
"what is the peace that should extend to the lewd practices of your mother
Izevel and her abundant witchcrafts"?
23] And Yehoram turned his hands and
fled and said to Ahazyahu, Treachery, Ahazya.
24] Then Yehu drew a bow with
his full strength and hit Yehoram between his arms and the arrow went out at his
heart and he sank down in his chariot.
25] Now he said to Bidkar his captain,
take him up and toss him into the portion of field of Navot the Yizri'elite, for
remember when I and you rode together after Ahav his father, so
had G-d pronounced this burden upon him.
26] "Surely I have seen
yesterday the blood of Navot, and the blood of his sons", says G-d, "and I will
bring retribution upon you in this plot of ground" says G-d; so now take
him and toss him into the plot of ground according to the word of G-d.
27]
But when Ahazya the king of Judah saw this, he fled by the way of the garden
house; then Yehu chased after him and he said, also he too, strike him upon the
chariot in the ascent of Gur which is by Yivli'am. And he fled to Megiddo and
died there.
II Kings chapter 9
30] Then Yehu came to Yizri'el and
Izevel heard and painted her eyes and adorned her head and looked out at the
window.
31] Then Yehu came to the gate and she said, Is it peace? you Zimri,
who killed his master?
32] And he lifted up his face to the window and he
said who is with me? Who? And there looked out at him two or three officers.
33] Then he said, throw her down, so they threw her down and some of her
blood was sprinkled on the wall and on the horses and he trampled her.
34]
Then he came in and ate and drank and said: go see now to this cursed woman and
bury her for she is the daughter of a king.
35] Then they went to bury her
and did not find her except for her skull, her legs and the palms of her
hands.
36] So they came back and told him. And he said, this is the word of
G-d, which he spoke by his servant Eliyahu {Elijah} the Tishbite, saying, in the
portion of Yizri'el shall dogs eat the flesh of Izevel.
37] And the carcass
of Izevel shall be as dung upon the open field in the portion of Yizri'el; so
that they shall not be able to say, This is Izevel.
II Kings chapter
10
6] Then he wrote a letter the second tome to them saying, if you are mine,
and you will obey my voice, take the heads of the men your master's sons and
come to me to Yizri'el tomorrow this time; now the king's son, being seventy
persons, were with the notable of the city , who were raising them.
7] And it
came to pass when the letter came to them, that they took the king's sons and
slew seventy persons and put their heads in baskets and sent him them to
Yizri'el.
II Kings chapter 10
11] So Yehu slew all that remained of
the house of Ahav in Yizri'el and all his great men and his familiar friends and
his priests until he left none remaining.
12] And he rose and he came and
went towards Shomron, namely, he was at the shepherds' meeting house on the
way.
13] Then Yehu found the brothers of Ahazyahu King of Judah and said,
"who are you"? and they told him, "we are the brothers of Ahazyahu and we are
going down for the welfare of the sons of the king and the sons of the queen
mother".
14] Then he said, take them alive. And they took them alive and slew
them at the pit of the meeting house, forty two men and he did not let any of
them survive.
15] Then he went from there and came across Yehonadav the
son Rekhav coming to meet him and he blessed him and he said to him, is your
heart upright as my heart is with your heart? Then Yehonadav answered it is,
indeed it is, give me your hand, so he put out his hand and he took him up to
him to the chariot.
16] Then he said, come with me and see when I am zealous
for G-d; so they set him up for riding in his chariot.
17] Then he came to
Shomron and slew all that remained for Ahav in Shomron until he had utterly
destroyed him according to the saying of G-d which he spoke to
Eliyahu.
II Kings chapter 10 verse 30
30] And G-d said to
Yehu, because you have done well in executing that which is right in my eyes,
and have done to the house of Ahav according to all that was in my heart, your
children of the fourth generation shall sit on the throne of
Israel. From here perhaps there is a proof that
after the prophet had anointed David as king, it became his obligation to kill
Sha'ul that shed blood [the cohanim/priests of Nov] at the first opportunity,
just as Yehu received praise, when he at the command of G-d shed the blood of
the king from the house of Ahav at the first
opportunity. And the verse testifies that by
exterminating the house of Ahav the result is "that I shall be avenged of the
blood of my servants the prophets, and the blood of all the servants of G-d at
the hand of Izevel". That is to say that the purpose of the assassination was to
remove the killers that ruled the people. One should add that even though the
person that was killed here was the son of Ahav and not Ahav himself [who was
punished in a different manner] this son was also infected with the sin of
murder. For behold in II Kings chapter 6 verses 31 and 32 it is stated:
- 31] Then he said, the L-rd do so and more also to me, if the head of
Elisha the son of Shafat remains on him today.
- 32] But Elisha sat in his house and the elders sat with him; and the king
sent a man from before him; but before the messenger came to him, he said to
the elders, do you see how this son of a murderer has sent to remove my head?
See to it, that when the messenger comes, shut the door and push him out with
the door; is not the sound of his master's feet behind him?
Radak explained
there
32]
He sent a man - the king sent a man before him to
remove the head of Elisha.
But before - ...And the
matter of the verse is that the king sent a man before him to Elisha and before
the messenger appeared to him, he said to the elders that the king has sent a
man to remove his head, for it was told to him by means of
prophecy....
The son of a murderer - the son of
Ahav that murdered Navot, so too does he desire to murder
me.
In addition I should add that if there was a
danger that even Sha'ul might kill the prophet Samuel because he anointed David
[I Samuel 16,2] "Then Samuel said how can I go, for if Sha'ul hears, then he
will kill me", all the more so there was a high possibility that the king Yoram
[sometimes called Yehoram] the son of Ahav would have killed the man that
anointed Yehu to be king [this man according to the sages is the prophet Yona
{Jonah}] if he had the ability and therefore the king had the status of a Rodef.
For it is a commandment to kill the Rodef not just to save yourself but also in
order to save others [Shulchan Aruch, C.M. 425:1].
But
perhaps one could push away the proof that David erred.
For the son Ahav had a number of deficiencies that weren't present in the case
of Sha'ul. Therefore perhaps by Yoram, there was no room for piety above the law
in order to spare him from death, while in the case of Sha'ul it was fitting to
be pious above the strict letter of the law.
Deficiencies That Were Present Specifically In Yoram
[Yehoram] The Son Of Ahav
Despite all of his
deficiencies, Sha'ul was very religious. But it seems based on II Kings, chapter
3 verse 3 that it is applicable to Yoram the son of Ahav what the author of the
Shulchan Aruch ruled in C.M. 425:5 , namely:
- An Apikorus from Israel, and they are idol worshippers
or those that do transgressions in order to anger G-d, even if he ate an
improperly slaughtered animal or wore a garment that contains a forbidden
mixture of fabrics in order to anger G-d, such a person falls under the
category of an Apikorus, that deny the Torah and the prophets of Israel; it
being a mitzvah to kill them; if he has the power in his hand to do it openly,
he kills. And if not, he should make use of trickery until he should cause
their deaths. How? If he sees one of them fall into a well and there is a
ladder in the pit, he comes early and says: "behold I am occupied with getting
my son down from the roof and I will return it to you, and similar methods
like this. But the star worshippers [ a euphemism to avoid the wrath of the
censor ] when we don't have a state of war between them and us, and the
shepherds of sheep and goats in places where the fields belong to Israelites
and similar people to these, we do not cause their deaths, but it forbidden to
save them. In what case our we dealing with, with an Israelite who is a sinner
and he continually stands in his wickedness and repeats it continually, such
as, the shepherds of sheep and goats who act lawlessly regarding robbery and
they go in their evil ways; however an Israelite who is a sinner but does not
stand in his wickedness continually, rather he does transgressions for
personal gratification, for example, he eats improperly slaughtered animals to
satisfy his passion, such a person, it is a mitzvah [ a commandment ] to save
him and it is forbidden to stand inactive while his blood is being shed" (see
Yoreh Deah chapter 158).
- Sha'ul didn't prevent anyone in Israel from celebrating Passover,
Shavuot, and Succot according to Jewish law. But Yoram did prevent them. And
this is a translated quote of Radak on Hoshea chapter 8 verse 4: "And even
though the kingdom of Yarovom [Jeroboam] was from the Almighty, may he be
blessed, like Ahiyya the Shilonite had said; {however} at the time that
they appointed him king they did not ask the mouth of G-d and Ahiyya the
prophet; nor did he say to them to appoint him as king, rather he just
told him the future. Furthermore, once they saw that he prevented them from
ascending to Jerusalem before G-d and he [in addition] made calves [as statues
for forbidden worship] they should have removed him from the monarchy
for Ahiyya said that the condition for being a monarch is he does
what is right in the eyes of G-d. And similarly the other kings of Israel
were not appointed by the mouth of G-d, except for Yehu the son of
Nimshi".
- Sha'ul had a righteous son that gave him rebuke. We didn't hear that
Yoram had a righteous son.
A Proof From the Case of Bar Kamtza
In the tractate Gittin pages 55 and 56 we
learn that the Caesar of Rome sent an animal to be sacrificed at the Temple and
the wicked man Bar Kamtza physically damaged the animal. It was a type of
blemish that invalidates the animal for the sacrificial service by Torah
standards, however, according to the standards of the Gentiles, it does
not.
The sages of the Sanhedrin thought to eliminate
Bar Kamtza who threatened to inform to the Emperor that the Jews were planning a
revolt against Rome. The proof being that the Jews didn't agree to sacrifice the
Emperor's animal.
At the end they did not kill Bar
Kamtza because an elder of the Sanhedrin, Rabbi Zechariah son of Avkulos claimed
that one should be pious above the law and not kill Bar Kamtza [
who was a
Rodef] because perhaps people will wrongfully deduce that Bar Kamtza was
killed because he put a blemish on an animal that was consecrated for a
sacrifice and not because he was a Rodef.
Concerning the
piety of Rabbi Zechariah the Talmud states: "Rabbi Yochanan said
'Onvutanuto' of Rabbi Zechariah son of Avkulos destroyed our
Temple burnt the Heichal Building [where the Holy of Holies was located] and
exiled us from our land".
Rashi explained there,
'Onvutanuto' - His tolerance that he tolerated this and did not
kill him".
And the Meiri commentary there explained: -
"And you learn from this that all who have a presumption of striking the
community by means of the monarchy, it is permitted to kill him and as they
said, "they thought to kill him so he wouldn't go and inform on them to the
monarchy. Rabbi Zechariah said to them", etc. Now they said about him, the
tolerance that he tolerated this and did not kill him destroyed our
Temple".
From here we learn seemingly, a proof that
there is no room for piety above the law when a Rodef endangers the entire
community. And just as the results testified that Rabbi Zechariah erred when he
showed piety above the law, so too the results of the compassion of David for
Sha'ul testify that David erred.
Notwithstanding all of
what I have written, it is difficult to end with a conclusion that King
David made such a serious mistake, because:
- For with great strain we can claim that Rabbi Zechariah son Avkulos erred
in regard to what conditions we use to apply the law of sanctification
of the name of G-d [which supersedes our obligation to preserve life] and he
was not simply trying to be pious above the law. Or else we can say that there
is a type of piety above the letter of the law that it is worthwhile to
endanger ourselves on behalf of this, while there is another type of piety,
which does not justify putting the community in danger.
- When our sages list the sins of David in Tractate Yoma page 22 and in
tractate Shabbat page 56, they do not count among them his compassion for
Sha'ul.
- The Bible several times calls David by the name "Servant of G-d", and
in I Kings 15:5 the Bible seemingly testifies that David isn't guilty of the
serious sin of Rabbi son of Avkulos. Now this is a translated quote of the
Bible there: "that David did what was upright in the eyes of G-d and did not
depart from all that he commanded him all the days of his life, except for the
matter of Uriah the Hitti".
The Final Conclusion
Therefore by straining ourselves we are forced to conclude
that even though
the results of David's compassion for Sha'ul were awful, nevertheless, if David
had killed Sha'ul, the evils befalling Israel would have been greater.
If so, I will try "to patch up" Malbim's viewpoint
in order to understand on the simple level how to explain the actions of
David.
The first possibility to explain David's decision
is the following:
- At the beginning David assumed that the most efficient method available to
deal with the danger that stood before him and his soldiers was to kill
Sha'ul. However after he saw Sha'ul's chastity, he concluded that Sha'ul is
still somewhat connected spiritually to G-d, and is capable of being swayed to
change his ways by proper rebuke. Together with the bad feeling that David
received when he cut Sha'ul's robe [which David saw as a sign from G-d], he
concluded that he didn't size up the reality of the situation correctly. He
concluded that since Sha'ul was the anointed of G-d, there would be many
loyalists of Sha'ul [despite the love of Yehonatan] who would try to take
revenge or to kill David [at the very least among the soldiers of Avner] if
David was responsible in any way for Sha'ul's death. Therefore he concluded
that in the long run, there would be less danger to him and his soldiers,
specifically by showing mercy to Sha'ul, combined with proper rebuke that
would cause Sha'ul to change his ways [which did indeed occur on a temporary
basis].
- Another possibility to explain David's actions is that, in the merit of
the attribute of chastity of Sha'ul in the cave, David received Divine
inspiration from G-d [in contrast to simply a bad feeling] at the time that he
cut Sha'ul's robe. Namely, he received the correct understanding, that one
should not kill Sha'ul because the fit time and conditions for Sha'ul's reign
as king to end, had not yet arrived.
Now I found a number of sayings of the sages to support this
viewpoint.
In Yalkut Shimoni to II
Samuel chapter 19 we explicitly learn that another enemy of David, namely, Shimi
the son of Geira, was saved in merit of the Divine Inspiration that David
received concerning Shimi. Therefore it is not so difficult for us to assume
that David also received Divine Inspiration in the matter of how to deal with
Sha'ul. And here I will quote from the words of the midrash:
- "Shall there be any man put to
death this day?", etc. - David saw by Divine Inspiration that in the
future a man would descend from him that would perform a great act of
salvation and he is called "a Jewish man" [Esther 2:5]. In his merit the Holy
One Blessed Be He said to David, "you saved Shimi in order that this righteous
man would be born. On your name shall I write him for it was said, 'a Jewish
man' [Esther 2:5]". Regarding this it was stated "the memory of the righteous
for a blessing" [ Mishlei/Proverbs 10:7 ] - This is Mordechai, "and the name
of the wicked shall rot" [ Mishlei/Proverbs 10:7 ] - this is Haman and
his colleagues.
- In Midrash Shocher Tov [110:5] it is written: "The words of G-d to my
master sit at my right or alternately translated, sit for my Benjaminite"
[Psalms 110:1] wait for Sha'ul the son of Kish, a Benjaminite [ based on I
Samuel 9:1 ], for still it his time and after Sha'ul dies you will be king.
- In the Targum translation to Psalms 110:1 thus is it written: G-d said by
his words to place me master over all of Israel, however he told me sit for a
while for Sha'ul who is of the tribe of Benjamin until he dies; for one
monarchy does not come sooner than its time at the expense of a fellow
monarchy.
Appendix:
Undue Flattery to Agripas
and Those Similar to Him
It is stated in tractate Sotah at the end of
chapter 7 that at the time when King Agripas was reading the verse, "You may
not appoint a foreigner", etc. [Deuteronomy 17:15] tears dripped from his eyes
because he was not from the seed of Israel. They said to him, "you are our
brother". Now at the same time Israel became liable to extinction because they
unduly flattered Agripas. For even though they didn't have the ability to
protest, nevertheless, they should have been silent and not strengthen
him in this way [by saying you are legitimate, you are our brother]. And this
is the punishment of one who gives undue flattery in the matter of a
transgression because he is afraid of the other person and is not concerned
about the fear of the Holy One Blessed be He [until here is the translated
quote of the Mishna Brura chapter 156].
The Vilna Gaon Predicted That The Generation In Which
The Son Of David Arrives In Will Be Entirely Liable Based On A Sin Similar To
The "Agripas Sin"
Rabbi Yochanan stated, if you see a
generation continually getting smaller, wait for him, for it was stated, "And
the afflicted {alt translated, poor} people you shall save", etc. [II Samuel
22:28]. Rabbi Yochanan stated, if you see a generation that many troubles come
upon it [the generation] as a narrow river, wait for him, for it was stated,
For he will come as a narrow river a spirit of G-d is miraculous within it
[Yishayahu/Isaiah 59:19]. And in the adjacent verse, "Now a redeemer shall
come to Zion". Furthermore, Rabbi Yochanan stated, the son of David only comes
in a generation that is entirely meritorious or entirely liable. In a
generation that is entirely meritorious, for it is written, "And your nation,
all of them are righteous forever they shall inherit the land" [Isaiah 60:21].
In a generation that is entirely liable, for it is written, "And he saw that
there was no man and he was astonished for there was no intercessor"
[Yishayahu 59:16]. And it is written, "For my sake I will do it" [Yishayahu
48:11]. [Rabbi Yochanan's words are quoted from tractate Sanhedrin page
98].
The Vilna Gaon explained in his commentary to
Esther 1:5 , derech haremez, over what issue will the generation be
entirely liable and here are his words:
And the matter
is that in the footsteps of the Messiah, audacity will be come great [end of
tractate Sotah] and the youths shall strongly embarrass the elders and
the elders shall rise before the youths. Now this is their intention of what
was said [tractate Hagiga, page 14] "18 curses did Yishayahu {Isaiah} curse
them with, but his mind was not appeased" etc. Now this is hard to accept. For
did it enter your mind that Yishayahu was a hater of Israel? Rather every
hardship that befalls Israel in the exile brings closer the deliverance, as it
is stated, "a payment that is entirely of hardship". Therefore all the curses
are for their benefit; but even so, his mind was not appeased until he said,
"the youth shall behave with arrogance towards the elder" [Yishayahu 3:5], for
then definitely the messiah comes, for in the footsteps of the messiah
audacity will become great. And the matter of this audacity is that they
establish a judge and a leader who is not fit. And they said [tractate
Sanhedrin page 7] "All who establish a judge who is not fit, it as though they
have planted a wooden Asheira idol", etc. Furthermore in the Yerushalmi they
are called gods of silver and gods of gold [see there the words of Maharsha].
Now therefore the youths embarrass the elders. However that the elders stand
before the youths, who forced them to do this? Rather the audacity has become
overwhelming and it is even present in the elders and in all of them, also in
the great men of the generation. And they said, [tractate Sotah page 41] "At
the time that they gave undue flattery to Agripas, the enemies of
Israel [a euphemism to avoid saying a negative statement] became liable to
extinction. And therefore Israel became liable specifically in that
generation.
by Mr. Shlomo Moshe Scheinman (the author of an article on Argaman that appeared in Techumin, Volume 26)
Additional Topics